Perspectives
Voices of Change: Diverse Perspectives on Patient Benefit
Creating a patient-centered healthcare system requires collaboration and understanding across all stakeholders. This section highlights the diverse perspectives gathered from clinical experts, patient advocates, and policy specialists during our research process.
Clinical Experts
"Patient clinical benefit should be defined by patients themselves, focusing on outcomes that matter to them. This goes beyond just medical outcomes to include impacts on quality of life, ability to work, caregiving responsibilities, and treatment accessibility. Patient preferences and experiences should drive the definition of clinical benefit, not just be factored in at the end. However, the definition may need to be nuanced based on different contexts, such as hospitals, payers, or clinical guideline developers."
Physician Society
Patient Advocates
"Patient clinical benefit should be defined as outcomes that allow the patient and caregiver to function and interact with their community (home, work, neighborhood, society), as defined by the patient/caregiver. Clinical (biometrics) and functional (e.g., walking) endpoints are means to the end. We are too often using proxies for what people really want and need."
Patient Advocate
Policy Representatives
"A better, more standardized approach would help inform healthcare decisions. Without it, we are using more subjective measures that are subjected to political influence or arguments not based in evidence. A standardized approach makes the decisions more legitimate and comparable."
Health Economics Researcher
Challenges & Considerations
- Creating standardized measurements across diverse populations and disease states.
- Overcoming systemic barriers within existing healthcare structures.
- Ensuring equity and fair representation in data collection and analysis.
Next
Ready to take action? Discover our recommendations for implementing Patient Benefit.